Theoretical Price
What an option should cost, according to a model and an assumption. The number is useful exactly as far as the assumption is, and the gap to the market price is where the information lives.
In short: the theoretical price (also model price or theoretical value) is what a pricing model, usually Black-Scholes for Indian options, says an option is worth given the spot, strike, time to expiry, interest rate and an assumed volatility. Four inputs are facts; the volatility is a view. If the view is the market's own implied volatility, the theoretical price is the market price. If it is anything else, the gap between the two prices is the gap between your volatility view and the market's.
The intuition
An option's value is the expected payoff at expiry, discounted to today, under some assumption about how the underlying will move. A pricing model makes that assumption explicit: the underlying's returns are random with a particular spread, and the spread is the volatility input. Feed in a spread and the model integrates over every possible ending to produce one number. That number is the theoretical price. It is exact for the assumption and only as good as the assumption.
This is why two traders can compute different theoretical prices for the same contract and both be right about the arithmetic. One used 12% volatility and got ₹373; the other used 14% and got ₹424. The model did not disagree with itself; the traders disagreed about the future. The market price is a third opinion, the one that clears.
The inputs
| Input | Source | Effect on a call |
|---|---|---|
| Spot price | Observed | Higher spot, higher call |
| Strike | Contract term | Higher strike, lower call |
| Time to expiry | Contract term | More time, higher call |
| Risk-free rate | Observed (T-bill or MIBOR) | Higher rate, slightly higher call |
| Volatility | Assumed | Higher volatility, higher call and put |
Dividends enter for stock options; for index options the expected dividend yield is small and usually folded into the rate. The rate itself matters less than beginners expect: in the example below, dropping it from 6.5% to zero moves the 27-day at-the-money call from ₹424 to about ₹365, while dropping volatility from 14% to 12% moves it to ₹373. Over a month, two volatility points are worth about as much as the entire interest rate.
Worked example (illustrative numbers)
Suppose NIFTY is at 24,000, the 24,000 call has 27 days to expiry, the risk-free rate is 6.5%, and the call is quoted in the market at ₹450. Running Black-Scholes at different volatility assumptions:
| Volatility assumed | Theoretical call price | Versus market ₹450 |
|---|---|---|
| 12% (a quiet recent month) | ₹373 | market ₹77 above model |
| 14% (a typical level) | ₹424 | market ₹26 above model |
| 15.0% (the implied volatility) | ₹450 | equal, by construction |
Read the table backwards. The market is paying ₹450, which means it is pricing 15% volatility for the next 27 days. Whether ₹450 is "too much" depends on whether you believe the coming month will realise less than 15%. If the last month realised 12% and nothing is scheduled, the three-point gap is the normal premium sellers demand. If an RBI policy meeting and a budget sit inside the window, 15% may be modest. The theoretical price turned a rupee quote into a volatility statement that can be argued with; it did not settle the argument.
Why it matters to an options trader
- It converts prices into volatility, which is comparable. ₹450 on a 24,000 call and ₹207 on a 24,500 call cannot be compared directly; 15% and 14% can.
- It is the basis of every Greek. Delta, gamma, theta and vega are the sensitivities of the theoretical price to its inputs; without a model there are no Greeks.
- It prices what has not traded. At a strike with no trades for an hour, the theoretical price at the neighbouring strikes' IV is a better guide than the stale last print.
- It runs scenarios. Move the spot by 300 points and the clock by three days, and the model tells you what the position will be worth, which is how risk is managed before it happens.
Common mistakes
- Calling the theoretical price "fair value". It is fair under the assumption. The market disagreeing with your assumption is not a market error.
- Using one volatility for every strike. The market prices a smile; a flat-volatility theoretical price will show every far put as overvalued, always, and be wrong about it.
- Using historical volatility and selling every "overpriced" option. The gap to historical is the volatility risk premium; it is the seller's expected income and also the reason sellers get hurt when realised volatility jumps.
- Ignoring the rate and dividends on long-dated or stock options. On a month they are small; on a six-month stock option with a dividend inside the window they are not.
- Trusting a platform's theoretical price without knowing its volatility input. Two platforms showing different theoretical values are usually using different IV sources, not different models.
Indian-market specifics
- NSE options are European since 2011 for stocks and from inception for indices, so Black-Scholes is the appropriate model and the binomial model adds nothing for them.
- NSE's published implied volatility on the option chain is the volatility at which the Black-Scholes theoretical price equals the last traded price; it is blank where there is no trade.
- The risk-free input used in India is typically the 91-day T-bill yield or MIBOR; NSE's own calculations for margin use a prescribed rate. Across a one-month option the choice barely moves the price.
- For physically settled stock options, the theoretical price near expiry is the same as for a cash-settled one; settlement mechanics change what you receive, not what the model says the right is worth.
FAQ
What is the theoretical price of an option?
The value a pricing model assigns from spot, strike, time, rate and an assumed volatility; a model output, not a quote.
Why does the theoretical price differ from the market price?
Because of the volatility input; at the market's implied volatility the two are equal.
Is an option trading above its theoretical price overvalued?
Only relative to your volatility assumption; the gap is a question, not an answer.
Which model is used for theoretical prices on NSE options?
Black-Scholes, since NSE options are European.
How is the theoretical price used in practice?
To check stale quotes, run scenarios and compare contracts on one volatility assumption.
The implied volatility behind every quote
The NIFTY option-chain page shows the implied volatility at every strike, which is the volatility at which the theoretical price matches the market. In the app, the option chain shows the Greeks at each strike alongside the premium.
Related terms
- Black-Scholes Model, the model behind the number
- Implied Volatility, the volatility at which theory meets market
- Historical Volatility, the usual alternative input
- Volatility Smile, why one volatility does not fit every strike